Being this is a new benchmark, and we haven’t run many systems with this, we posted the output of the GPU compute scores as a reference. SPECworkstation 3 is the new workstation benchmark from SPEC. SPECworkstation 3 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 SPECworkstation 3 GPU Compute Scores The WX 8200 rolls in at second place in some tests compared to much higher cost graphics cards in Part 1 tests and gave a good showing in Part 2 benchmarks. AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 SPECviewperf AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Viewperf Part 1 AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Viewperf Part 2 SPECviewperf 12 measures the 3D graphics performance of systems running under the OpenGL and Direct X application programming interfaces. NVIDIA uses math performance at different precision levels to differentiate features in its cards. The WX 8200 crushes the 24-bit integer IOPS results. AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 AIDA64 GPGPU Part 2

Most GPUs do not have dedicated execution resources for 64-bit integer operations, so instead, they emulate the 64-bit integer operations via existing 32-bit integer execution units. This particular data type defined in OpenCL on the basis that many GPUs are capable of executing int24 operations via their floating-point units.ģ2-bit Integer IOPS: Measures the classic MAD (Multiply-Addition) performance of the GPU, otherwise known as IOPS (Integer Operations Per Second), with 32-bit integer (“int”) data.Ħ4-bit Integer IOPS: Measures the classic MAD (Multiply-Addition) performance of the GPU, otherwise known as IOPS (Integer Operations Per Second), with 64-bit integer (“long”) data. The next set of benchmarks from AIDA64 are.Ģ4-bit Integer IOPS: Measures the classic MAD (Multiply-Addition) performance of the GPU, otherwise known as IOPS (Integer Operations Per Second), with 24-bit integer (“int24”) data. AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 AIDA64 GPGPU AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 AIDA64 GPGPU Part 1 Single-Precision FLOPS: Measures the classic MAD (Multiply-Addition) performance of the GPU, otherwise known as FLOPS (Floating-Point Operations Per Second), with single-precision (32-bit, “float”) floating-point data.ĭouble-Precision FLOPS: Measures the classic MAD (Multiply-Addition) performance of the GPU, otherwise known as FLOPS (Floating-Point Operations Per Second), with double-precision (64-bit, “double”) floating-point data. These benchmarks are designed to measure GPGPU computing performance via different OpenCL workloads. The WX 8200 easily takes the high score for LuxMark based on OpenCL versus Pascal and earlier NVIDIA generations. LuxMark is an OpenCL benchmark tool based on LuxRender. OpenCL is the strong point for the WX 8200 which we will see in other benchmarks also. While the WX 8200 does not have a CUDA score, it does show a powerful OpenCL score which rates up with higher-end GPU’s. Geekbench 4 measures the compute performance of your GPU using image processing to computer vision to number crunching. This is the start to a new series, so we are going to add these to some of our legacy results before filling in newer cards in subsequent reviews. Lastly, Camera Motion Blur has been added, Adaptive Subdivision has been added to the 3ds Max and Maya plug-ins, and the 3ds Max plug-in has been updated to support 3ds Max 2019.We are going to run through a few benchmarks just to give some sense of where this card performs.

Also, AMD’s added an Ambient Occlusion node that can - for instance - make textures look dirty. The Uber Shader will now support diffuse backscattering and will have a simplified caustics option and an improved clear coat appearance. This includes new features, plug-ins and updated integrations. Radeon ProRender UpdatesĪt SIGGRAPH 2018 this year, AMD also announced a few new updates coming to Radeon Pro Render. The Pro WX 8200 will be out September and is up for pre-order. It seems the Pro WX 8200 outperformed the Quadro P5000 in this test There are several instances where this card beats out the competition, including the more expensive Nvidia Quadro P5000,” says AMD. “When it comes to performance, the Radeon Pro WX 8200 workstation graphics card is no slouch. According to a study cited in the press release, AMD claims the WX 8200 proved to be 20% faster at rendering than the P5000.

Amd radeon pro wx 8200